"Although some might find this unbelievable, there are reasons to think it plausible that Karl Rove could be an atheist. Rove and other neoconservatives seem to use the political philosophy of Leo Strauss who taught, in part, that religion was necessary to control people.
[...]
First: Strauss believed that a leader had to perpetually deceive the citizens he ruled.
Secondly: Those who lead must understand there is no morality, there is only the right of the superior to rule the inferior.
Thirdly: According to Drury, Religion "is the glue that holds society together." It is a handle by which the ruler can manipulate the masses. Any religion will do. Strauss is indifferent to them all.
Fourthly: "Secular society…is the worst possible thing," because it leads to individualism, liberalism, and relativism, all of which encourage dissent and rebellion. As Drury sums it up: "You want a crowd that you can manipulate like putty."
Fifthly: "Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat; and following Machiavelli, he maintains that if no external threat exists, then one has to be manufactured."
Sixthly: "In Strauss's view, the trouble with liberal society is that it dispenses with noble lies and pious frauds. It tries to found society on secular rational foundations."
About Atheism April 28, 2007
Sunday, April 29, 2007
Is Karl Rove an Atheist? What Does George W. Bush Believe?
Etiketter:
atheism,
atheist,
athiesm,
athiest,
comment,
deception,
Karl Rove,
Katherine Yurica,
Leo Strauss,
lies,
machiavelli,
neoconservative,
opinion,
philosophy,
relativism,
religion,
USA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment